State “Death” Taxes and Elderly Migration – The Chicken or the Egg?
Researchers and state policymakers have hypothesized that the elderly may move to another state to avoid paying “death” (i.e., inheritance, estate, gift) taxes. This belief may be responsible for the recent revolution in state “death” tax policy whereby 30 states have eliminated their death taxes in favor of the ‘pick-up’ tax since 1976. Is this hypothesis empirically valid? Past research, while weakly supportive, has important limitations casting doubt on their findings. Foremost, all past studies use cross-sectional data. The validity of this approach is questioned, however, when one observes that states which were historically big net-importers of the elderly were also the first to eliminate their death taxes. This begs the question of causality: does heavy net inmigration lead to reduced “death” taxes or do low death taxes capture some unobserved, longstanding desirability of the state for the elderly? Our analysis addresses this issue by using migration data from four different censuses (1970, 1980, 1990, 2000) combined with information about changes in state ‘death’ tax policy to track how changes in elderly movements are related to changes in death tax policy. A second improvement lies in our measure of state death tax policy. Unlike tax shares and effort indices, which will be nonzero for ‘pick-up’ states when the true net burden to the estate is zero, our measure is the first to properly account for the ‘pick-up’ tax when appropriate. Our final advance borrows from the difference-in-difference approach, using nonelderly age groups as our ‘control’. This advance is important because the elderly tend to move to the same states as the working population; what one really wants to capture are differential effects on elderly migration. The end result of our research will provide a more accurate picture of how elderly migration responds to state fiscal policy, especially state ‘death’ taxes.
To our knowledge, this item is not available for
download. To find whether it is available, there are three
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.
|Date of creation:||11 Aug 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: 1 212 998 3820|
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nawm04:111. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.