IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/nasm04/657.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Belief Formation in Social Networks: a Large Field Experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Tanya Rosenblat
  • Markus Mobius

Abstract

We use a new web-based experimental methodology to measure social networks through a coordination game. Subjects name 10 people in their community as well as report certain dimensions of their relationship with them such as where they met, under what circumstance they met and how much time they spend with each other on average per week. For each name subjects receive a small payoff with a probability which is increasing in the number of dimensions on which the two subjects agree. We apply the game to a subject pool of 800 upper-class undergraduates in two residential houses at a private university and find that our network game results in highly accurate data with a very large degree of coordination. We use our framework to test two questions which have been difficult to study because they require large amounts of data on complete social networks. First of all, we study the effects of social distance and relative position within the social network on trust between subjects and second, we study how agents form beliefs and how information spreads in social networks using a tamagotchi market.

Suggested Citation

  • Tanya Rosenblat & Markus Mobius, 2004. "Belief Formation in Social Networks: a Large Field Experiment," Econometric Society 2004 North American Summer Meetings 657, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:657
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    TBD;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:nasm04:657. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.