IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/latm04/92.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Evaluating The Performance Of Non-Experimental Estimators: Evidence From A Randomized Ui Program

Author

Listed:
  • Jose Galdo

Abstract

One of the lessons of the treatment effects literature is the lack of consensus about the ability of statistical and econometric methods to replicate experimental estimates. In this paper, we provide new evidence using an unusual unemployment insurance experiment that allows the identification of discontinuities in the assignment mechanism. In particular, we use a set of regression functions and matching estimators based on kernel methods with mixed categorical and continuous data. A crucial issue with the kernel approach is the choice of the smoothing parameters. We develop a leave-one-out cross-validation algorithm that minimizes the mean square error of the average treatment effect on the treated weighting each comparison unit according to their distribution of covariates in the support region. Two main findings emerge. First, local constant and nearest-neighbor matching on kernel-based propensity score with mixed categorical and continuous data produces a closer approximation to the experimental estimates than traditional parametric propensity score models do. Second, the regression-discontinuity design emerges as a promising method for solving the evaluation problem. When restricted to sample observations in the neighborhood of the discontinuity points, the estimates are close approximation to the experimental estimates and are robust across different subsamples and estimators.

Suggested Citation

  • Jose Galdo, 2004. "Evaluating The Performance Of Non-Experimental Estimators: Evidence From A Randomized Ui Program," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 92, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:latm04:92
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Treatment Effects; Kernels with Mixed Data; Cross-Validation; Matching; Regression-Discontinuity Design;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C21 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Single Equation Models; Single Variables - - - Cross-Sectional Models; Spatial Models; Treatment Effect Models
    • C52 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:latm04:92. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Christopher F. Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.