IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Nash Equilibrium under Knightian Uncertainty: A Generalization of the Existence Theorem


  • Paulo C. Coimbra-Lisboa


Dow and Welang (1994) extended the notion of Nash equilibrium for two-player finite normal games when players are uncertainty on the behavior of his opponents. They showed the existence of equilibrium for any given degree of uncertainty however constant over all possible events, except the null and the whole event). Using a different definition of support, Marinacci (2000) proved the existence of Nash equilibrium for any given uncertainty aversion function. In this paper I will extend Dow and Werlang(1994)’s Nash equilibrium under uncertainty using the same definition of support that they used and a parametrical approach, based on the uncertainty aversion function, which enable me to do comparative static exercises in a easy way. I will work with convex capacities that are “squeezes†of (additive) probability measures, as defined in Coimbra-Lisboa (2003)

Suggested Citation

  • Paulo C. Coimbra-Lisboa, 2004. "Nash Equilibrium under Knightian Uncertainty: A Generalization of the Existence Theorem," Econometric Society 2004 Latin American Meetings 242, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:latm04:242

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item


    Ellsberg paradox; Knightian uncertainty; capacities (non-additive probabilities); uncertainty aversion; Choquet integral; equilibrium concepts.;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D81 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty


    Access and download statistics


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:latm04:242. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.