An Empirical Test of Industrial Targeting:
This paper first show that South Korea's industrial targeting in the name of heavy and chemical industry drive in the 1970s managed to produce industries with international competitiveness over time. It then performs ex post cost-benefit analysis to show that industrial targeting in Korea has failed to pay off. One reason is that targeted industries grow fast during their long infancy period but growth slows down after they mature. Another reason is that the cost incurred during the infancy period consists of a large margin of protection and subsidy while the benefit reaped after maturation is composed only of excess profitability. The results suggest that an eclectic view is needed in interpreting the 'East Asian Miracle.'
|Date of creation:||11 Aug 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: 1 212 998 3820|
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.aspEmail:
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:794. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.