IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecm/feam04/714.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Smooth Test For Testing Equality Of Two Densities

Author

Listed:
  • Zhijie Xiao
  • Anil K. Bera
  • Aurobindo Ghosh

Abstract

It has been a conventional wisdom that the two-sample version of the goodness-of-fit test like the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, Cramér-von Mises and Anderson-Darling tests fail to have good power particularly against very specific alternatives. We show that a modified version of Neyman Smooth test that can also be derived as a score test based on the empirical distribution functions obtained from the two samples remarkably improves the detection of directions of departure. We can identify deviations in different moments like the mean, variance, skewness or kurtosis terms using the Ratio Density Function. We derive a bound on the relative sample sizes of the two samples for a consistent test and an "optimal" choice range of the sample sizes to ensure minimal size distortion in finite samples. We apply our procedure to compare the age distributions of employees insured with small employers

Suggested Citation

  • Zhijie Xiao & Anil K. Bera & Aurobindo Ghosh, 2004. "Smooth Test For Testing Equality Of Two Densities," Econometric Society 2004 Far Eastern Meetings 714, Econometric Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:714
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Empirical distribution function; Locally optimal tests; score test; sample size selection; smooth test; two-sample test; simulation study;

    JEL classification:

    • C12 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Hypothesis Testing: General
    • C14 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Semiparametric and Nonparametric Methods: General
    • C15 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General - - - Statistical Simulation Methods: General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:714. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/essssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.