Optimal Successor Liability
In case of a merger or an acquisition, a tort liability that arises from the seller's conduct is often imposed on the buyer through the doctrine of successor liability. If the buyer has as much information about the potential liability as the seller, the first best is achieved: all gains from acquisition are realized and the seller takes the efficient amount of precaution. However, when the seller has more information about the potential liability than the buyer, there could be too little acquisition, too little incentive on the seller, or both. The court can increase the successor liability to improve welfare. We show that imposing a higher damages against the surviving seller is better than increasing the liability against the buyer
|Date of creation:||11 Aug 2004|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Phone: 1 212 998 3820|
Fax: 1 212 995 4487
Web page: http://www.econometricsociety.org/pastmeetings.asp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecm:feam04:686. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.