IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/4219.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Spiderweb of Partnership Tax Structures

Author

Listed:
  • Hess, Ryan

    (U of Georgia)

  • Black, Emily

    (New York U)

  • Javed, Zaynah

    (Stanford U)

  • Hennessy, Jonathan

    (Stanford U)

  • Lester, Rebecca

    (Stanford U)

  • Goldin, Jacob

    (U of Chicago)

  • Ho, Daniel E.

    (Stanford U)

  • Portz, Annette

    (US Internal Revenue Service)

Abstract

U.S. partnerships control more than $40 trillion in assets, vastly outnumber U.S. public firms, and contribute significantly to the U.S. tax non-compliance of pass-through entities, which is larger than the non-compliance of publicly traded corporations. However, the prior literature provides extremely little evidence explaining the pervasive use of such entities and which specific characteristics enable the lightly taxed nature of partnership business income. Using administrative U.S. tax data, we first create graphical organizational structures by tracing income through millions of partnership entities. We show that 80 percent of partnership groups are simple structures composed of one single partnership owned directly by individual taxpayers. In contrast, the most complex structures resemble “webs,†characterized by multiple tiers of ownership and clusters of overlapping partners. Second, we determine the entity attributes associated with partnerships developing into complex organizations. Third, conditional on being selected for audit, complex partnerships are four percent less likely to be assessed additional tax, but the amount of assessments is larger. Fourth, we show that complex partnership audits have a high return-on-investment, generating $20 of assessments for each $1 spent, which is a rate over eight times that for corporations. Thus, beyond adding to the nascent literature explaining the prevalent use of partnerships, we provide new insights about the under-reporting of tax on U.S. business income and quantify the potentially large increases in tax revenue collection that could be obtained from increased enforcement of complex partnership businesses.

Suggested Citation

  • Hess, Ryan & Black, Emily & Javed, Zaynah & Hennessy, Jonathan & Lester, Rebecca & Goldin, Jacob & Ho, Daniel E. & Portz, Annette, 2024. "The Spiderweb of Partnership Tax Structures," Research Papers 4219, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4219
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/spiderweb-partnership-tax-structures
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • D85 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Network Formation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies
    • H25 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Business Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4219. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.