IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/4191.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fading Corporate Survival Prospects: Impact of Co-selection Bias in Resource Allocation on Strategic Intent

Author

Listed:
  • Burgelman, Robert A.

    (Stanford U)

  • Aaltonen, Pertti

Abstract

Our field study of new business development in a German-based global pharmaceutical company reveals that the emergence of co-selection bias in project-level state-gate resource allocation engendered a corporate-level innovation portfolio imbalance. We show how the corporate portfolio imbalance resulted from incoherent managerial activities in the multilevel resource allocation process (RAP) decision context and how this caused fizzling out of the proactively established incipient strategic context of the favored-for-growth business unit. Moreover, we identify strategic RAP exploitation challenges that explain why sequential exploitation capability and exploitation drive deficits caused an exploitation trap that limited strategic discretion and stymied top management strategic intent to maintain the company’s independence. Our integrated frameworks augment strategic management theory of corporate RAP and offer guidance for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Burgelman, Robert A. & Aaltonen, Pertti, 2024. "Fading Corporate Survival Prospects: Impact of Co-selection Bias in Resource Allocation on Strategic Intent," Research Papers 4191, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/faculty-research/working-papers/fading-corporate-survival-prospects-impact-co-selection-bias
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:4191. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.