IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/3938.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Ecology of Practices: Employer Prestige and Alumni Homophily in Work Ties

Author

Listed:
  • Sterling, Adina

    (Stanford U)

  • Wang, Shiya

    (Stanford U)

Abstract

In this article we develop a network-ecology approach in which we argue that the position of an organization vis-a-vis other organizations in an external hierarchy--its status or prestige--affects the level of social similarity in its employees' professional work ties. We test our argument using data on over 85,000 lawyers employed by 303 of the largest U.S. law firms. Dyadic and concentration-ratio analyses support our predictions. We find that lawyers' work ties have a greater level of social similarity on an important basis--shared alumni affiliations--at less prestigious law firms than at more prestigious ones. We close with implications of this study for literature on social networks, organizations, and careers.

Suggested Citation

  • Sterling, Adina & Wang, Shiya, 2021. "Ecology of Practices: Employer Prestige and Alumni Homophily in Work Ties," Research Papers 3938, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
    • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3938. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.