IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/3668.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Netflix Approach to Governance: Genuine Transparency with the Board

Author

Listed:
  • Larcker, David F.

    (Stanford University)

  • Tayan, Brian

    (Stanford University)

Abstract

The hallmark of good corporate governance is an independent board of directors to oversee management. However, it is not clear that independent directors receive the information they need to make fully informed decisions on all key matters. Partly, this is due to an information gap, whereby outside directors know substantially less about the business and market because of their limited exposure to the day-to-day activities of the company. Netflix has devised a unique approach to information sharing with the goal of significantly increasing transparency among the CEO, executive team, and board of directors: Board members attend senior management meetings throughout the year, and board presentations are structured as online memos in narrative form with direct links to supporting analysis as well as all data and information on the company's internal shared systems. We examine these practices in detail and ask: Does greater transparency improve board decisions? Would other boards benefit from more active interaction with management and an open view of its decision-making processes? How transferable is the Netflix approach to other companies? What qualities are required of a CEO to be willing to engage with board members in this manner? Could a company adopt one of these practices and not the other and still benefit from greater transparency?

Suggested Citation

  • Larcker, David F. & Tayan, Brian, "undated". "Netflix Approach to Governance: Genuine Transparency with the Board," Research Papers 3668, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3668
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/gsb-cmis/gsb-cmis-download-auth/461081
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:3668. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.