IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/2018.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Models of Job Preference for Stanford MBA's '78

Author

Listed:
  • Montgomery, David B.

    (Singapore Management University)

  • Wittink, Dick R.

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to determine if the decision-making process for choosing between alternative job offers by Stanford MBA's is affected by a task requiring an individual to evaluate hypothetical combinations of a limited number of job characteristics. Based on a paramorphic representation of the decision-making process, the ability to predict which job is chosen by the individual does not appear to be influenced by exposure to the task. However, the ability to predict the preference order of the job offers differed significantly between the experimental and control groups. This difference is probably due to a phenomenon similar to the testing effect. Models developed at various levels of aggregation are explored and differences in job preferences related to background variables are noted. For example, female students on the average, appear to be less interested in financial remuneration and less career-oriented than male students, even after adjusting for marital status and other background variables.

Suggested Citation

  • Montgomery, David B. & Wittink, Dick R., 2009. "Models of Job Preference for Stanford MBA's '78," Research Papers 2018, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:2018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/RP2018.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Van Damme, Eric, 2002. "Strategic equilibrium," Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications,in: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (ed.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications, edition 1, volume 3, chapter 41, pages 1521-1596 Elsevier.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:2018. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.