IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecl/stabus/1656.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy

Author

Listed:
  • Baron, David P.

    (Stanford U)

Abstract

This paper provides a theory of private politics in which an activist seeks to change the production practices of a firm for the purpose of redistribution to those whose interests it supports. The source of the activist's influence is the possibility of support for its cause by the public. The paper also addresses the issue of corporate social responsibility by distinguishing among corporate redistribution as motivated by profit-maximization, altruism, and threats by the activist. Private politics and corporate social responsibility not only have a direct effect on the costs of the firm, but they also have a strategic effect by altering the competitive positions of firms in an industry. From an integrated strategy perspective the paper investigates the strategic implications of private politics and corporate social responsibility for the strategies of rival firms when one or both is the target of an activist campaign. Implications for empirical analysis are derived from the theory.

Suggested Citation

  • Baron, David P., 2000. "Private Politics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Integrated Strategy," Research Papers 1656, Stanford University, Graduate School of Business.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1656
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://gsbapps.stanford.edu/researchpapers/library/rp1656.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Helen Bao & Haotong Li, 2017. "CEO Overconfidence in Real Estate Markets: A Curse or A Blessing?," ERES eres2017_157, European Real Estate Society (ERES).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecl:stabus:1656. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/gsstaus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.