IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecj/ac2003/65.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Reducing Attrition Bias using Targeted Refreshment Sampling and Matching

Author

Listed:
  • Dolton, Peter

    (University of Newcastle)

Abstract

This paper examines the possibility of reducing attrition bias in panel data using targeted refreshment sampling and matched imputation. The targeted refreshment sampling approach consists of collecting new data from the original sampling population from individuals who would never usually respond to surveys. Using propensity score matching and imputation in conjunction with refreshment sampling it is suggested that the dropouts from a panel can effectively be 'replaced'. The procedure allows us to identify underlying joint distributions in the data. The method is illustrated using data from the Youth Cohort Surveys in the UK which suffer 45% attrition in the second wave. A comparison of the results of this method with other techniques for attrition modeling suggest that the technique could be an effective way to overcome a substantial part of the bias associated with attrition.

Suggested Citation

  • Dolton, Peter, 2003. "Reducing Attrition Bias using Targeted Refreshment Sampling and Matching," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2003 65, Royal Economic Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:65
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/res2003/Dolton.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Richard Dorsett, 2004. "Using matched substitutes to adjust for nonignorable nonresponse: an empirical investigation using labour market data," PSI Research Discussion Series 16, Policy Studies Institute, UK.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    attrition; refreshment sampling;

    JEL classification:

    • C1 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2003:65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.