The complementarity of RJVs and R&D subsidies when absorptive capacity matters
This paper introduces a model of coordination of research paths into the theory of Research Joint Ventures (RJVs). A comparison of RJVs and licensing by non-cooperative firms shows that the latter may be unable to co-ordinate on complementary research paths whereas RJVs are always able to do this. This happens when the acquisition of absorptive capacity is costly. It is shown that the policies of promoting RJVs and subsidizing R&D are complementary, whereas either policy by itself may reduce welfare. Finally it is shown that costly absorptive capacity gives rise to a welfare loss that is very difficult to address.
|Date of creation:||29 Aug 2002|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 2 Dean Trench Street, Westminster, SW1P 3HE|
Phone: +44 20 3137 6301
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/society/annualconf.asp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2002:178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.