The complementarity of RJVs and R&D subsidies when absorptive capacity matters
This paper introduces a model of coordination of research paths into the theory of Research Joint Ventures (RJVs). A comparison of RJVs and licensing by non-cooperative firms shows that the latter may be unable to co-ordinate on complementary research paths whereas RJVs are always able to do this. This happens when the acquisition of absorptive capacity is costly. It is shown that the policies of promoting RJVs and subsidizing R&D are complementary, whereas either policy by itself may reduce welfare. Finally it is shown that costly absorptive capacity gives rise to a welfare loss that is very difficult to address.
|Date of creation:||29 Aug 2002|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Office of the Secretary-General, Rm E35, The Bute Building, Westburn Lane, St Andrews, KY16 9TS, UK|
Phone: +44 1334 462479
Web page: http://www.res.org.uk/society/annualconf.asp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2002:178. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.