IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ecj/ac2002/161.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

An Axiomatization of Linear Cumulative Prospect Theory with Applications to Portfolio Selection and Insurance Demand

Author

Listed:
  • Schmidt, Ulrich

    (Christian-Albrechts-Universit‚ÄĚt zu Kiel, The University of Manchester)

  • Horst Zank

Abstract

The present paper combines loss attitudes and linear utility by providing an axiomatic analysis of corresponding preferences in a cumulative prospect theory (CPT) framework. CPT is one of the most promising alternatives to expected utility theory since it incorporates loss aversion, and linear utility for money receives increasing attention since it is often concluded in empirical research, and employed in theoretical applications. Rabin (2000) emphasizes the importance of linear utility, and highlights loss aversion as an explanatory feature for the disparity of significant small-scale risk aversion and reasonable large-scale risk aversion. In a sense we derive a two-sided variant of Yaari s dual theory, i.e. nonlinear probability weights in the presence of linear utility. The first important difference is that utility may have a kink at the status quo, which allows for the exhibition of loss aversion. Also, we may have different probability weighting functions for gains than for losses. The central condition of our model is termed independence of common increments. The applications of our model to portfolio selection and insurance demand show that CPT with linear utility has more realistic implications than the dual theory since it implies only a weakened variant of plunging.

Suggested Citation

  • Schmidt, Ulrich & Horst Zank, 2002. "An Axiomatization of Linear Cumulative Prospect Theory with Applications to Portfolio Selection and Insurance Demand," Royal Economic Society Annual Conference 2002 161, Royal Economic Society.
  • Handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2002:161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://repec.org/res2002/Schmidt.pdf
    File Function: full text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ecj:ac2002:161. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/resssea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.