IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eca/wpaper/2013-391423.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The Impact of Firm-level Covid Rescue Policies: Evidence for Wallonia

Author

Listed:
  • Glenn Magerman
  • Dieter Van Esbroeck

Abstract

This paper evaluates the impact of Covid-19 support measures on firms in Wallonia. Using a rich set of administrative data, we analyze the allocation and effects of firm-level subsidies implemented in 2020–2021 in response to the pandemic. We find that support programs were taken up by mostly small, young firms, and in sectors most affected by lockdowns, such as retail, food services, and construction. We find no evidence of misallocation of resources towards ’zombie firms’, firms which tend to not contribute value added to the economy. Firms that received support experienced an 8–9% increase in labor productivity relative to firms that applied for, but did not obtain support. The impact on firm productivity persists at least one year after support. Moreover, receipt of support is associated with a 19% reduction in the likelihood of firm exit. These findings suggest that the support measures were effective in maintaining economic activity and avoiding mass firm failures during the crisis. These results are also consistent with findings for Flanders, reinforcing the evidence base for the design of crisis-response policies

Suggested Citation

  • Glenn Magerman & Dieter Van Esbroeck, 2025. "The Impact of Firm-level Covid Rescue Policies: Evidence for Wallonia," Working Papers ECARES 2025-09, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/391423
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/391423/3/2025-09-MAGERMAN_VANESBROECK-the-impact.pdf
    File Function: Œuvre complète ou partie de l'œuvre
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/391423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Benoit Pauwels (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/arulbbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.