IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/eca/wpaper/2013-257913.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Successes and Failures of Water and Sanitation Governance Choices in Sub-Saharan Africa (1990-2017)

Author

Listed:
  • Antonio Estache

Abstract

Based on a survey of evidence on progress and of analytical diagnostics from various angles, the paper argues that, under current management and reform strategies, the SSA countries still lagging in coverage are unlikely to reach the universal water access and adequate sanitation targets promised by the Sustainable Development Goals set in 2016. This is not just about more, it is also about faster and better. And it is not only by the countries themselves, but it needs to imply all stakeholders in a coordinated way. There are three main explanations. The first is that, despite all the bells and whistles on achievements, financing constraints continue to be quite binding. Second, many of the local and international stakeholders continue to be slow at internalizing the lessons from the strategic mistakes in reform and technology choices and, in particular, in their implementation. And third, the current handling of the fast and accelerating urbanization process in the region, combined with an high population growth, is having unplanned and unmanaged perverse effects on the level and nature of the demand for service. Change has been coming and continues to come. But it is too slow and too unfocused to help fast enough the poorest who continue to be excluded from the benefits of improvements in the sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Antonio Estache, 2017. "Successes and Failures of Water and Sanitation Governance Choices in Sub-Saharan Africa (1990-2017)," Working Papers ECARES ECARES 2017-32, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
  • Handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/257913
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://dipot.ulb.ac.be/dspace/bitstream/2013/257913/3/2017-32-ESTACHE-successes.pdf
    File Function: Full text for the whole work, or for a work part
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eca:wpaper:2013/257913. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Benoit Pauwels). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/arulbbe.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.