IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ebg/heccah/1305.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Fame as an Illusion of Creativity: Evidence from the Pioneers of Abstract Art

Author

Listed:
  • Mitali, Banerjee

    (HEC Paris - Strategy & Business Policy)

  • Ingram, Paul L.

    (Columbia Business School - Management)

Abstract

We build a social structural model of fame, which departs from the atomistic view of prior literature where creativity is the sole driver of fame in creative markets. We test the model in a significant empirical context: 90 pioneers of the early 20th century (1910–25) abstract art movement. We find that an artist in a brokerage rather than a closure position was likely to become more famous. This effect was not, however, associated with the artist’s creativity, which we measured using both objective computational methods and subjective expert evaluations, and which was not itself related to fame. Rather than creativity, brokerage networks were associated with cosmopolitan identities—broker’s alters were likely to differ more from each other’s nationalities--and this was the key social-structural driver of fame.

Suggested Citation

  • Mitali, Banerjee & Ingram, Paul L., 2018. "Fame as an Illusion of Creativity: Evidence from the Pioneers of Abstract Art," HEC Research Papers Series 1305, HEC Paris.
  • Handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3258318
    File Function: Full text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dakshina G De Silva & Georgia Kosmopoulou & Rachel A J Pownall & Robert Press, 2022. "Posthumous trading patterns affecting artwork prices [Financial returns, price determinants, and genre effects in American art investment]," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 74(2), pages 453-472.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    fame; creativity; identity; creative markets; social networks; social structure;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Z11 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economics of the Arts and Literature

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ebg:heccah:1305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Antoine Haldemann (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/hecpafr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.