IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dys/benwps/02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Finger Fruits: Pre-Sliced Fruit in Schools Increases Sales and Intake

Author

Listed:
  • Brian Wansink

    (Cornell University)

  • David R. Just

    (Cornell University)

  • Andrew S. Hanks

    (Cornell University)

Abstract

Laddering interviews indicate that a leading reason younger children do not select fruit is because braces and small mouths make it difficult to eat. Older children – especially females – avoid it because it is messy and makes them look unattractive when eating it. One solution for both sets of reservations would be to offer pre-sliced fruit. The purpose of this study is to determine if offering pre-sliced fruit increases the selection and intake of fruit among elementary students and middle school students. Two studies were conducted. Following a pilot study in elementary schools, three out of six middle schools were randomly given commercial fruit slicers and the selection and consumption of sliced apples was compared to that of the control schools. Researchers collected data in the cafeteria so all students who purchased an apple were included in the study. Only waste data were collected so no personal identifying information was recorded. In both studies, treatment schools were given a standard commercial fruit slicer (also referred to as a “sectionizer”). These slicers have a reservoir into which a piece of fruit is placed (apples, oranges, pears, grapefruit). A plunger with different configurations of steel blades is then pushed down and it cores the fruit and cuts it into six symmetric pieces into a bowl below. The process is quick, taking an average of just over 3 seconds per fruit. The main outcomes that were measured included apple sales, percentages of apples wasted, and percentages of apples consumed. Results from Study 1 show that the fruit slicer increased apples sales in elementary schools by 60.6%. In study 2, apple sales increased by 41% and apple consumption increased by 17%. Therefore, it was concluded that environmental interventions are useful in influencing people to eat more healthful foods. This study relies on the principle of convenience and provides evidence that sliced fruit is more appealing than unsliced fruit, simply due to eating convenience and neatness. There is plenty of opportunity for research to identify effective applications of convenience, or other environmental changes that promote healthy eating behavior.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian Wansink & David R. Just & Andrew S. Hanks, 2012. "Finger Fruits: Pre-Sliced Fruit in Schools Increases Sales and Intake," Working Papers 02, Cornell Center for Behavioral Economics in Child Nutrition Programs.
  • Handle: RePEc:dys:benwps:02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dys:benwps:02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Andrew S. Hanks (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dacorus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.