IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dur/durham/2026_13.html

Flood Voting

Author

Listed:
  • Yit Wey Liew

    (Sunway University)

  • Muhammad Habibur Rahman

    (University of Durham)

Abstract

This paper examines how a major natural disaster reshapes political preferences using the 1998 Bangladesh flood. Combining district-level flood exposure with individual responses from the 1996 and 2002 World Values Survey, we find that flood exposure increases rejection of both dominant parties, the Awami League and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party, while making the Jatiya Party, the major third political force, rela tively more attractive. The political response is strongest in the most severely flooded areas and among economically disadvantaged respondents, while greater government relief is associated with a smaller increase in rejection of the two dominant parties. These results suggest that political dissatisfaction following a disaster need not simply shift support from the government to its main rival. Instead, major shocks can weaken both dominant parties and create space for an alternative political force, a pattern we term "flood voting".

Suggested Citation

  • Yit Wey Liew & Muhammad Habibur Rahman, 2026. "Flood Voting," Department of Economics Working Papers 2026_13, Durham University, Department of Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:dur:durham:2026_13
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.durham.ac.uk/business/media/durham-university-business-school/about-us/departments/economics-and-finance/working-papers-pdfs/2026_13.pdf
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dur:durham:2026_13. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tatiana Damjanovic (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/deduruk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.