IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/duk/dukeec/97-18.html

The Effects of Import Quotas on National Welfare: Comment

Author

Listed:
  • Tower, Ed
  • Gokcekus, Omer

Abstract

Recently in the Southern Economic Journal Palivos and Yip marry real and monetary analysis to provide an intriguing new argument for protection. Is this an idea which international agencies like the World Trade Organization and the World Bank should educate their member countries about? The authors consider an economy with differential cash-in-advance constraints, fiat money, and no interest payments on cash. They argue that the first best policy in such an economy is differential consumption taxes, and if the exportable is cash intensive a second best policy is an import quota. In this Comment we argue that paying interest on cash (or equivalently deflating the economy) is better than differential taxation because it is administratively simpler and cheaper; for variants of the model it is welfare superior; and it is less susceptible to manipulation by rent seekers.

Suggested Citation

  • Tower, Ed & Gokcekus, Omer, 1997. "The Effects of Import Quotas on National Welfare: Comment," Working Papers 97-18, Duke University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:97-18
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a
    for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Theodore Palivos & Chong K. Yip, 1997. "The Effects of Import Quotas on National Welfare: Reply," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 64(2), pages 588-591, October.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:97-18. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Department of Economics Webmaster (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://econ.duke.edu/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.