IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/duk/dukeec/13-15.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Enhanced Versus Traditional Indexation for International Mutual Funds: Evaluating DFA, WisdomTree and RAFI Powershares

Author

Listed:
  • Edward Tower
  • Heehyun Lim

Abstract

Do enhanced index funds beat traditional ones? The major companies that offer the new enhanced index international mutual funds are Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA), RAFI, and WisdomTree. A major provider of traditional international index funds is DFA. We compare various enhanced international index fund portfolios from these providers with individualized benchmark portfolios composed of DFA traditional international funds. On average, (1) the RAFI power share portfolio out-returned its corresponding DFA traditional benchmark portfolio by 0.82%/year, (2) the average DFA enhanced portfolio under-returned by 0.14%/year, and (3) the WisdomTree portfolio under-returned by 1.01%/year. One cheer for enhanced international indexation and two for traditional indexation.

Suggested Citation

  • Edward Tower & Heehyun Lim, 2013. "Enhanced Versus Traditional Indexation for International Mutual Funds: Evaluating DFA, WisdomTree and RAFI Powershares," Working Papers 13-15, Duke University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:13-15
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2288677
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Enhanced index fund; Fundamental indexation; Style analysis;

    JEL classification:

    • G11 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - Portfolio Choice; Investment Decisions
    • G15 - Financial Economics - - General Financial Markets - - - International Financial Markets

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:13-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Department of Economics Webmaster). General contact details of provider: http://econ.duke.edu/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.