IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Enhanced Versus Traditional Indexation for International Mutual Funds: Evaluating DFA, WisdomTree and RAFI Powershares

Listed author(s):
  • Edward Tower
  • Heehyun Lim

Do enhanced index funds beat traditional ones? The major companies that offer the new enhanced index international mutual funds are Dimensional Fund Advisors (DFA), RAFI, and WisdomTree. A major provider of traditional international index funds is DFA. We compare various enhanced international index fund portfolios from these providers with individualized benchmark portfolios composed of DFA traditional international funds. On average, (1) the RAFI power share portfolio out-returned its corresponding DFA traditional benchmark portfolio by 0.82%/year, (2) the average DFA enhanced portfolio under-returned by 0.14%/year, and (3) the WisdomTree portfolio under-returned by 1.01%/year. One cheer for enhanced international indexation and two for traditional indexation.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
File Function: main text
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by Duke University, Department of Economics in its series Working Papers with number 13-15.

in new window

Length: 15
Date of creation: 2013
Handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:13-15
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Department of Economics Duke University 213 Social Sciences Building Box 90097 Durham, NC 27708-0097

Phone: (919) 660-1800
Fax: (919) 684-8974
Web page:

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:13-15. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Department of Economics Webmaster)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.