IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/duk/dukeec/02-33.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

RULES FOR AN EMERGENT MARKET: Selling paintings in late seventeenth-century London

Author

Listed:
  • De Marchi, Neil

Abstract

Conditions of sale were a feature of the Roman auction, and probably published along with the written public announcement, the proscriptio , that preceded a sale. When such conditions appeared on the front pages of printed sale catalogues for paintings, prints and drawings in late seventeenth-century London, then, this was nothing new; but the rules themselves were almost certainly modified to fit the circumstances then prevailing. Here I wish to examine those rules and explore the rationale for either modifying traditional elements among them or introducing some for - it seems - the first time. I will also use the exploration as an occasion to conduct two additional probes. One of these will be into the likely level and structure of prices in these early London sales, the inquiry into structure revealing that many sales were two-in-one, appealing to dual audiences. The other probe will show that the market was also segmented by quality and location, which must have restricted the possibilities for immediate profitable resale and thus the likelihood that individuals' bids were influenced by those of others.

Suggested Citation

  • De Marchi, Neil, 2002. "RULES FOR AN EMERGENT MARKET: Selling paintings in late seventeenth-century London," Working Papers 02-33, Duke University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:02-33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.econ.duke.edu/Papers/Abstracts02/abstract.02.33.html
    File Function: main text
    Download Restriction: no

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:duk:dukeec:02-33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Department of Economics Webmaster). General contact details of provider: http://econ.duke.edu/ .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.