IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dra/wpaper/201302.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Conditional inference trees in dynamic microsimulation - modelling transition probabilities in the SMILE model

Author

Abstract

Determining transition probabilities is a vital part of dynamic microsimulation models. Modelling individual behaviour by a large number of covariates reduces the number of observations with identical characteristics. This challenges determination of the response structure. Data mining using conditional inference trees (CTREEs) is found to be a useful tool to quantify a discrete response variable conditional on multiple individual characteristics and is generally believed to provide better covariate interactions than traditional parametric discrete choice models, i.e. logit and probit models. Deriving transition probabilities from conditional inference trees is a core method used in the SMILE microsimulation model forecasting household demand for dwellings. The properties of CTREEs are investigated through an empirical application aiming to describe the household decision of moving from a number of covariates representing various demographic and dwelling characteristics. Using recursive binary partitioning, decision trees group individuals’ responses according to a selected number of conditioning covariates. Recursively splitting the population by characteristics results in smaller groups consisting of individuals with identical behaviour. Classification is induced by recognized statistical procedures evaluating heterogeneity and the number of observations within the group exposed to a potential split. If a split is statistically validated, binary partitioning results in two new tree nodes, each of which potentially can split further after the next evaluation. The recursion stops when indicated by the statistical test procedures. Nodes caused by the final split are called terminal nodes. The final tree is characterized by a minimum of variation between observations within a terminal node and maximum variation across terminal nodes. For each terminal node a transitional probability is calculated and used to describe the response of individuals with the same covariate structure as characterizing the given terminal node. That is, if a terminal node consists of single males aged 50 and above living in rental housing, individuals with such characteristics are assumed to behave identically with respect to moving when transitioning from one state to another.

Suggested Citation

  • Niels Erik Kaaber Rasmussen & Marianne Frank Hansen & Peter Stephensen, 2013. "Conditional inference trees in dynamic microsimulation - modelling transition probabilities in the SMILE model," DREAM Working Paper Series 201302, Danish Rational Economic Agents Model, DREAM.
  • Handle: RePEc:dra:wpaper:201302
    Note: Conference paper for the 4th General Conference of the International Microsimulation Association
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.dreammodel.dk/SMILE/N2013_04.pdf
    File Function: First version, 2013
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Cathal O'Donoghue & Gijs Dekkers, 2018. "Increasing the Impact of Dynamic Microsimulation Modelling," International Journal of Microsimulation, International Microsimulation Association, vol. 11(1), pages 61-96.
    2. Danish Rational Economic Agents Model, DREAM, 2015. "Long-term economic projection 2014," DREAM Working Paper Series 201502, Danish Rational Economic Agents Model, DREAM.
    3. Niels Erik Kaaber Rasmussen & Peter Stephensen, 2014. "A Microsimulation Model for Educational Forecasting," DREAM Working Paper Series 201402, Danish Rational Economic Agents Model, DREAM.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    conditional inference tree; CTREE; dynamic microsimulation; modelling transition probability;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dra:wpaper:201302. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Stephensen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dreamdk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.