IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/doj/eagpap/202401.html

Scarcity of Ideas and Optimal R&D Policy

Author

Listed:
  • Suren Basov
  • Nisvan Erkal
  • Deborah Minehart

    (U.S. Department of Justice)

  • Suzanne Scotchmer

Abstract

We consider a model of innovation that distinguishes between ideas and innovations. While innovation responds to incentives, ideas are a scarce resource that provide an exogenous constraint on the rate of innovation. We investigate how the optimal reward structure is shaped by the scarcity of ideas. Substitute ideas for innovation in the model arrive to random recipients at random times. By foregoing investment in a current idea, society preserves an option to invest in a better idea for the same market niche but with delay. Because successive ideas may occur to different people, there is a conflict between private and social optimality. The social planner does not observe the arrival of ideas and learns over time about the arrival rate of ideas. We represent the social planner’s beliefs using a general continuous density and illustrate that the evolution of beliefs can be tracked by the cumulative hazard function. The reward set by the social planner serves a dual purpose: learning about the arrival rate of ideas and trading off lower delays against lower cost ideas. We show that the optimal reward increases as time passes because the social planner comes to view ideas as more scarce.

Suggested Citation

  • Suren Basov & Nisvan Erkal & Deborah Minehart & Suzanne Scotchmer, 2024. "Scarcity of Ideas and Optimal R&D Policy," EAG Discussions Papers 202401, Department of Justice, Antitrust Division.
  • Handle: RePEc:doj:eagpap:202401
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.justice.gov/atr/abstract-scarcity-ideas-and-optimal-rd-policy
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:doj:eagpap:202401. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Tung Vu (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/atrgvus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.