IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dkn/econwp/eco_2012_4.html

The robust result in meta-analysis of aid effectiveness: a response to Mekasha and Tarp

Author

Listed:
  • Doucouliagos, Hristos
  • Paldam, Martin

Abstract

Our study, Doucouliagos and Paldam (2008), has recently been critically discussed by Mekasha and Tarp (2011). In this paper we show that contrary to what they state, their study validates our basic analysis: Both papers confirm that the literature has shown that aid is of little economic importance in generating growth. M&T find some random coding errors with virtually no effect on the basic results. Furthermore, we discuss some methodological disagreements and show that their choice of the random effects model is not appropriate for the problem at hand, and that the way they use multiple MRAs contradicts the robust results reached at the basic analysis.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Doucouliagos, Hristos & Paldam, Martin, 2012. "The robust result in meta-analysis of aid effectiveness: a response to Mekasha and Tarp," Working Papers eco_2012_4, Deakin University, Department of Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:dkn:econwp:eco_2012_4
    DOI: 10.1080/00220388.2013.764595
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2013.764595
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00220388.2013.764595?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F35 - International Economics - - International Finance - - - Foreign Aid

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dkn:econwp:eco_2012_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Xueli Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedeaau.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.