Author
Abstract
Over the past 250 years occupational health and safety (OH&S) has become more important because the industrial revolution and mechanisation that accompanied it are very effective at damaging and killing workers. Whilst there are many calls for more attention and investment to be given towards the issues surrounding OH&S it is often not beneficial or cost effective to invest in OH&S. A priori reasoning would indicate that if it truly was cost effective this attention would have occurred. It is possible that people are just a bunch of sissies looking for any excuse to complain about work. The obvious conclusion then is that whilst OH&S does create certain costs and other problems, these are still less than the resources required to address them effectively. On a global level, it is estimated that over 5,000 people die every day due to accidents, injury or sickness contracted at work. For each fatality there is another 1,000 injuries which lead to incapacitation (Else, 2003). At a local level, in 2001 in Victoria 31 people were killed in workplaces in the Australian state of Victoria, and another 3711 were seriously injured (Victorian WorkCover Authority 2002). Putting on your Six Sigma Blackbelt Hat for a moment, in “quality speak” (i.e. defective parts per million) the results appear unacceptable and quite likely avoidable. With these figures it is important to answer the question of whether this is a necessary side-effect of present day society, or the result of failure to address key issues. If these costs and issues are avoidable, then a key question that must be examined is why firms are pursuing a sub-optimal strategy. This paper examines this question by looking at the role of Management Accounting and how it measures and reports OH&S information within organisations. As the role of management accounting is to support managers with relevant information it is important to examine whether OH&S costs are accurately collected, collated, and communicated to ensure that appropriate strategies are pursued. By evaluating this we are able to better evaluate the claims regarding OH&S.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dkn:acctwp:aef_2004_07. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Xueli Tang (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/sedeaau.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.