IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

The Role of Credibility and Fundamentals in a Funded Pension System: A Markov Switching Analysis for Australia and Iceland

Listed author(s):
  • Mariangela Bonasia
  • Oreste Napolitano

Since the turn of the millennium the problem of credibility of the social security system has spread to the private pension funds sector. This is evident for those countries, like Australia and Iceland, that have very large funded pensions assets as a result of strong pension reforms. The problem of trust could prevent pension fund investment from continuing to grow, weakening the privatization of the social security system. The objective of this study is to obtain new insights into the determinants of pension funds. We focus our analysis on the Australian and Icelandic experiences to study the credibility of pension fund performance and, as a consequence, of pension reform. Our credibility indicator is derived from a CAPM time-varying model. It can be used to investigate, using a Markov switching model, the linkages between economic fundamentals and the credibility of pension fund investment and the asymmetric effects of the fundamentals in the two regimes of low and hight credibillity. Our findings make a contribution to modelling policy credibility as a non-linear process with two distinct regimes. We also found large differences in the value of the coefficients for all macroeconomic variables between the low and high credibility regimes. This evidence strongly supports the hypothesis that the effects of macroeconomic fundamental variables on the level of credibility are asymmetric in all countries.

If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

File URL:
Download Restriction: no

Paper provided by DIW Berlin, German Institute for Economic Research in its series Discussion Papers of DIW Berlin with number 756.

in new window

Length: 37 p.
Date of creation: 2007
Handle: RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp756
Contact details of provider: Postal:
Mohrenstra├če 58, D-10117 Berlin

Phone: xx49-30-89789-0
Fax: xx49-30-89789-200
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:diw:diwwpp:dp756. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Bibliothek)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.