Performance of Business Models: Empirical Insights from the Software Industry
This paper analyses business models of software firms. The underlying framework comprises eight variables derived from a comprehensive software industry business model conceptualisation. Using this framework, we classify the business models of the global top 100 software firms based on their annual reports. Then, we run clustering algorithms in order to identify business model patterns. Clustering allows comparing patterns within and between business model clusters on different levels of granularity. Based on the business model clustering, we then analyse the firms’ financial performance in three categories: market value, profitability, and operating efficiency. Our results demonstrate which business model elements can be retrieved from annual reports. Further, we identify unique and similar business models among the sample firms. Some business models are found to outperform others and have distinguishing characteristics. This paper contributes to practice and research. Both can benefit from a structured industry overview in terms of today’s business models and their performance. This can be used to analyse the software industry and its firms. Practitioners can align their firms with the characteristics of top performing business models. For research, we also contribute to the body of knowledge of empirical business model performance.
|Date of creation:||11 Jul 2012|
|Note:||for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/57887/|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Hochschulstr. 1, 64289 Darmstadt|
Phone: ++49 (0)6151 16-2701
Fax: ++49 (0)6151 16-6508
Web page: http://www.wi.tu-darmstadt.de/fachgebiete/fachgebiete_4/betriebswirtschaftlichefachgebiete.de.jsp
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:57887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Dekanatssekretariat)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.