IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/160991.html

Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems vs. Traditional Order Picking Solutions: A Worthwhile Investment for Today's Warehouse Managers?

Author

Listed:
  • Wenzel, Julia
  • Emde, Simon
  • Elbert, Ralf
  • Weidinger, Felix

Abstract

Order picking is among the most expensive activities in warehouse logistics, making choosing an order picking system (OPS) one of the most important decisions for warehouse managers. Traditionally, the choice has been between automated and manual order picking systems. With the rise of e-commerce and the need for greater flexibility, robotic systems such as Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems (RMFS) have emerged as potential alternatives. Despite growing interest, many managers remain skeptical about their value. This study systematically compares an RMFS with traditional OPS, using autonomous vehicle storage and retrieval systems (AVS/R) and manual OPS (MOPS) as a reference, focusing on time, performance, and cost efficiency. Our results indicate that AVS/R systems are best for large, high-volume operations, while RMFS is a flexible and cost-effective choice, especially for e-commerce order volumes. RMFS offers steady use of resources and lower cost per order than MOPS, which have limits in throughput. Even though RMFS and AVS/R are quite different, RMFS is a worthwhile alternative.

Suggested Citation

  • Wenzel, Julia & Emde, Simon & Elbert, Ralf & Weidinger, Felix, 2026. "Robotic Mobile Fulfillment Systems vs. Traditional Order Picking Solutions: A Worthwhile Investment for Today's Warehouse Managers?," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 160991, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:160991
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/160991/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://tuprints.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/items/6dcf27da-e2ae-4379-b8b8-9cd3a7abec48
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:160991. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.