IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/157507.html

KfW-Energiewendebarometer 2025: Zustimmung stabil – jeder dritte Haushalt nutzt Energiewendetechnologie

Author

Listed:
  • Römer, Daniel
  • Rode, Johannes

Abstract

Stärkere Klimaschutz­maßnahmen verlieren derzeit in vielen Ländern an Popularität. Umso erfreulicher ist es, dass die Zustimmung zur Energiewende in Deutschland nach einem deutlichen Rückgang im vergangenen Jahr wieder leicht angestiegen ist. 83 % der deutschen Haushalte gaben im haushaltsrepräsentativen KfW-Energiewendebarometer an, dass die Energiewende wichtig oder sehr wichtig ist. Im Vorjahr waren es 82 %. Allerdings sind weniger Haushalte bereit, die Energiewende auch durch eigene Aktivität voranzutreiben. Insgesamt nutzen 13,5 Millionen und damit 33 % der deutschen Haushalte mindestens eine Energiewende­technologie. Das ist ein Anstieg um 800.000 Haushalte oder zwei Prozentpunkte zum Vorjahr. Zu den Energiewende­technologien zählen beispielsweise Wärmepumpen, Photovoltaik­anlagen, und Elektroautos. Die Wirtschaftlichkeit der Maßnahmen ist zentral für die Nutzung – und somit auch die Höhe der künftigen CO2-Bepreisung.

Suggested Citation

  • Römer, Daniel & Rode, Johannes, 2025. "KfW-Energiewendebarometer 2025: Zustimmung stabil – jeder dritte Haushalt nutzt Energiewendetechnologie," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 157507, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:157507
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/157507/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-KfW-Energiewendebarometer/KfW-Energiewendebarometer-2025.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.kfw.de/PDF/Download-Center/Konzernthemen/Research/PDF-Dokumente-KfW-Energiewendebarometer/KfW-Energiewendebarometer-2025-Methoden-und-Tabellenband.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xueying Lyu, 2023. "Are Electric Cars and Solar Panels Complements?," Journal of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, University of Chicago Press, vol. 10(4), pages 1019-1057.
    2. Bryan Bollinger & Kenneth Gillingham, 2012. "Peer Effects in the Diffusion of Solar Photovoltaic Panels," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(6), pages 900-912, November.
    3. Yann Quilcaille & Lukas Gudmundsson & Dominik L. Schumacher & Thomas Gasser & Richard Heede & Corina Heri & Quentin Lejeune & Shruti Nath & Philippe Naveau & Wim Thiery & Carl-Friedrich Schleussner & , 2025. "Systematic attribution of heatwaves to the emissions of carbon majors," Nature, Nature, vol. 645(8080), pages 392-398, September.
    4. Megan R. Bailey & David P. Brown & Blake Shaffer & Frank A. Wolak, 2025. "Show Me the Money! A Field Experiment on Electric Vehicle Charge Timing," American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, American Economic Association, vol. 17(2), pages 259-284, May.
    5. Rode, Johannes, 2025. "Jedes Jahr importiert Deutschland fossile Brennstoffe im Wert von Ø 81 Mrd. EUR," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 154561, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chihiro YAGI & Kenji TAKEUCHI, 2025. "Light after the darkness: Estimating the impact of power outages on subsequent solar installations," Discussion papers e-25-010, Graduate School of Economics , Kyoto University.
    2. Ball-Burack, Ari & Sun, Ruixiao & Stack, Stephen & Ou, Shiqi (Shawn) & Bose, Ranjan & Yang, Hung-Chia, 2025. "Assessing the behavioral realism of energy system models in light of the consumer adoption literature," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    3. Shijie Lu & Xin (Shane) Wang & Neil Bendle, 2020. "Does Piracy Create Online Word of Mouth? An Empirical Analysis in the Movie Industry," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 66(5), pages 2140-2162, May.
    4. Costa, Dora L. & Kahn, Matthew E., 2013. "Do liberal home owners consume less electricity? A test of the voluntary restraint hypothesis," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 210-212.
    5. Grafström, Jonas & Poudineh, Rahmat, 2023. "No evidence of counteracting policy effects on European solar power invention and diffusion," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Briguglio, Marie & Formosa, Glenn, 2017. "When households go solar: Determinants of uptake of a Photovoltaic Scheme and policy insights," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 154-162.
    7. Lan, Haifeng & Gou, Zhonghua & Yang, Linchuan, 2020. "House price premium associated with residential solar photovoltaics and the effect from feed-in tariffs: A case study of Southport in Queensland, Australia," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 907-916.
    8. Du, Hua & Han, Qi & de Vries, Bauke & Sun, Jun, 2024. "Community solar PV adoption in residential apartment buildings: A case study on influencing factors and incentive measures in Wuhan," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 354(PA).
    9. Palm, Alvar & Lantz, Björn, 2020. "Information dissemination and residential solar PV adoption rates: The effect of an information campaign in Sweden," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    10. Comin, Diego & Rode, Johannes, 2013. "From Green Users to Green Voters," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 63678, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    11. Kinga Tucholska & Bożena Gulla & Agnieszka Ziernicka-Wojtaszek, 2024. "Climate change beliefs, emotions and pro-environmental behaviors among adults: The role of core personality traits and the time perspective," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(4), pages 1-20, April.
    12. Lemay, Amélie C. & Wagner, Sigurd & Rand, Barry P., 2023. "Current status and future potential of rooftop solar adoption in the United States," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C).
    13. Christopher J. Blackburn & Mallory E. Flowers & Daniel C. Matisoff & Juan Moreno‐Cruz, 2020. "Do Pilot and Demonstration Projects Work? Evidence from a Green Building Program," Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(4), pages 1100-1132, September.
    14. Klein, Martin & Deissenroth, Marc, 2017. "When do households invest in solar photovoltaics? An application of prospect theory," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 270-278.
    15. Tibebu, Tiruwork B. & Hittinger, Eric & Miao, Qing & Williams, Eric, 2022. "Roles of diffusion patterns, technological progress, and environmental benefits in determining optimal renewable subsidies in the US," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    16. Stefan Lamp, 2023. "Sunspots That Matter: The Effect of Weather on Solar Technology Adoption," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(4), pages 1179-1219, April.
    17. Rode, Johannes & Müller, Sven, 2016. "Spatio-Temporal Variation in Peer Effects - The Case of Rooftop Photovoltaic Systems in Germany," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 84765, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    18. Bale, Catherine S.E. & McCullen, Nicholas J. & Foxon, Timothy J. & Rucklidge, Alastair M. & Gale, William F., 2013. "Harnessing social networks for promoting adoption of energy technologies in the domestic sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 833-844.
    19. Christa Brelsford & Caterina De Bacco, 2018. "Are `Water Smart Landscapes' Contagious? An epidemic approach on networks to study peer effects," Papers 1801.10516, arXiv.org.
    20. Lan, Haifeng & Gou, Zhonghua & Lu, Yi, 2021. "Machine learning approach to understand regional disparity of residential solar adoption in Australia," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:157507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.