IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/155585.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Rethinking Knowledge Brokerage: A Case Study of a Large Language Model in R&D

Author

Listed:
  • Wohlschlegel, Julian
  • Jussupow, Ekaterina
  • Pumplun, Luisa
  • Dittrich, Janek

Abstract

The work of knowledge brokers comprises the transfer, translation, and transformation of knowledge between individuals who are unlikely to interact efficiently because of knowledge boundaries. In an extension of this theory, algorithmic brokers are defined as individuals performing these practices with artificial intelligence (AI) output to enable a community to leverage this output in their work. However, with the introduction of large language models (LLMs), we argue this brokerage role is shifting and that LLMs have the potential to broker knowledge between humans. We conducted a case study with domain experts in a Research and Development (R&D) department of a large multinational science and technology company who regularly use a recently developed domain-specific R&D-LLM. Our preliminary findings show that the R&D-LLM is reshaping interactions between human experts through three knowledge brokerage practices of varying complexity, assisting in simple knowledge recall, enabling the approach to experts and being a simulated counterpart.

Suggested Citation

  • Wohlschlegel, Julian & Jussupow, Ekaterina & Pumplun, Luisa & Dittrich, Janek, 2025. "Rethinking Knowledge Brokerage: A Case Study of a Large Language Model in R&D," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 155585, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
  • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:155585
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/155585/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://authorconnect.aisnet.org/conferences/ECIS2025/papers/ECIS2025-1355
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/ecis2025/human_ai/human_ai/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:155585. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.