IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/dar/wpaper/150815.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

All Eyes on the Reviewer: Understanding the Impact of GenAI on Mental Workload and Performance in Code Reviews

Author

Listed:
  • Unzicker, Dominik
  • Mehler, Maren F.
  • Kammholz, Lisa
  • Sturm, Timo
  • Jourdan, Sara
  • Buxmann, Peter

Abstract

In order to achieve high-quality software, organizations use code reviews as an established quality assurance instrument in software development. With GenAI, organizations get the possibility to improve the time-consuming and cognitively demanding process of code review by assisting code reviewers with defect and improvement suggestions. As tools to support software development become more widely adopted, our research investigates the scenarios in which GenAI support helps reviewers perform better and addresses the relevance of mental workload in code reviews. As a result of our online experiment with 123 software developers, we can show that GenAI-assistance increases performance efficiency and effectiveness while decreasing the mental workload of reviewers when complex code is reviewed. This indicates that not only performance but also the human factor is important in the utilization of GenAI and the complexity of tasks should be considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Unzicker, Dominik & Mehler, Maren F. & Kammholz, Lisa & Sturm, Timo & Jourdan, Sara & Buxmann, Peter, 2024. "All Eyes on the Reviewer: Understanding the Impact of GenAI on Mental Workload and Performance in Code Reviews," Publications of Darmstadt Technical University, Institute for Business Studies (BWL) 150815, Darmstadt Technical University, Department of Business Administration, Economics and Law, Institute for Business Studies (BWL).
    • Handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:150815
    Note: for complete metadata visit http://tubiblio.ulb.tu-darmstadt.de/150815/
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2024/isdesign/isdesign/4
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:dar:wpaper:150815. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Dekanatssekretariat (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ivthdde.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.