IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cwl/cwldpp/2458.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Pipeline vs. Choice: The Global Gender Gap in STEM Applications

Author

Listed:
  • Isaac Ahimbisibwe

    (Baylor University)

  • Adam Altjmed

    (Stockholm University)

  • Georgy Artemov

    (University of Melbourne)

  • Andres Barrios-Fernandez

    (Universidad de los Andes)

  • Aspasia Bizopoulou

    (VATT Institute for Economic Research)

  • Martti Kaila

    (University of Glasgow)

  • Jin-Tan Liu

    (National Taiwan University)

  • Rigissa Megalokonomou

    (Monash University)

  • JosŽ Montalban

    (Stockholm University)

  • Christopher Neilson

    (Yale University)

  • Jintao Sun

    (Rice University)

  • Sebastian Otero

    (Columbia University)

  • Xiaoyang Ye

    (Amazon)

Abstract

Women account for only 35% of global STEM graduates, a share unchanged for a decade. We use administrative microdata from centralized university admissions in ten systems to deliver the first crossnational decomposition of the STEM gender gap into a pipeline gap (academic preparedness) and a choice gap (first-choice field conditional on eligibility). In deferred-acceptance platforms where eligibility is score-based, we isolate preferences from access. The pipeline gap varies widely, from -19 to +31 percentage points across education systems. By contrast, the choice gap is remarkably stable: high-scoring women are 25 percentage points less likely than men to rank STEM first.

Suggested Citation

  • Isaac Ahimbisibwe & Adam Altjmed & Georgy Artemov & Andres Barrios-Fernandez & Aspasia Bizopoulou & Martti Kaila & Jin-Tan Liu & Rigissa Megalokonomou & JosŽ Montalban & Christopher Neilson & Jintao S, 2025. "Pipeline vs. Choice: The Global Gender Gap in STEM Applications," Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers 2458, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University.
    • Handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:2458
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://cowles.yale.edu/sites/default/files/2025-09/d2458.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cwl:cwldpp:2458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Brittany Ladd (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cowleus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.