IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cuf/wpaper/805.html

The Republican Spirit of Innovism and Scale-Free Growth

Author

Listed:
  • Heng-fu Zou

Abstract

This paper develops a continuous-time growth model in which the central driver of modern economic progress is a cumulative stock of liberal ideas and institutions-the republican spirit of innovism. This stock combines dignity for ordinary people, liberty of entry and speech, and the prospect of fair reward, echoing the arguments of McCloskey, Phelps, Landes, and Mokyr. Liberal-ideas capital raises productivity and also enters directly into well-being by making life richer in meaning and opportunity. A share of labor is devoted to building and sustaining this liberal environment, while the rest produces goods. The model shows that long-run growth depends entirely on the growth of the liberal-ideas stock and on society's willingness to devote effort to sustaining it. Economies that place high value on dignity, openness, and creative initiative converge to paths of sustained enrichment, while those that neglect or erode liberal institutions fall into stagnation. Small differences in cultural and institutional commitment can therefore generate large and persistent differences in growth outcomes.

Suggested Citation

  • Heng-fu Zou, 2025. "The Republican Spirit of Innovism and Scale-Free Growth," CEMA Working Papers 805, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:cuf:wpaper:805
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://down.aefweb.net/WorkingPapers/w805.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Edmund Phelps, 2015. "Mass Flourishing: How Grassroots Innovation Created Jobs, Challenge, and Change," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 10058-2, December.
    2. Joel Mokyr, 2016. "A Culture of Growth: The Origins of the Modern Economy," Economics Books, Princeton University Press, edition 1, number 10835, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Heng-fu Zou, 2025. "The Republic of Entrepreneurs: A Critique of Schumpeter on Entrepreneurs, Innovation, and Cycles," CEMA Working Papers 799, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
    2. Heng-fu Zou, 2025. "How Mises Goes Beyond Knight — and Why It Matters: Entrepreneurship, Calculation, and the Republic of Entrepreneurs," CEMA Working Papers 800, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
    3. David Ahlstrom & Amber Y. Chang & Jessie S. T. Cheung, 2019. "Encouraging Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-14, November.
    4. Kovacs, Oliver, 2024. "Exaptationary Industry 4.0: Graphene as pathfinder?," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    5. Heng-fu Zou, 2025. "The Republic of Entrepreneurs: A Global History of Discovery, Diffusion, and Growth," CEMA Working Papers 801, China Economics and Management Academy, Central University of Finance and Economics.
    6. Heng-Fu Zou, 2025. "The Republic of Entrepreneurs: Letters, Science, and the Civic Mechanics of Modern Prosperity," Annals of Economics and Finance, Society for AEF, vol. 26(2), pages 465-500, November.
    7. Pies, Ingo & Hielscher, Stefan & Everding, Sebastian, 2020. "Do hybrids impede sustainability? How semantic reorientations and governance reforms can produce and preserve sustainability in sharing business models," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 174-185.
    8. Kevin L. KLIESEN & John A. TATOM, 2024. "Is American manufacturing in decline?," Journal of Economics Bibliography, EconSciences Journals, vol. 11(3-4), pages 41-63, December.
    9. Franck, Raphaël & Galor, Oded, 2021. "Flowers of evil? Industrialization and long run development," Journal of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 108-128.
    10. Watzinger, Martin & Schnitzer, Monika, 2019. "Standing on the Shoulders of Science," Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series 215, CRC TRR 190 Rationality and Competition.
    11. Aki Tomizawa & Li Zhao & Geneviève Bassellier & David Ahlstrom, 2020. "Economic growth, innovation, institutions, and the Great Enrichment," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 37(1), pages 7-31, March.
    12. Robert J. Shiller, 2017. "Narrative Economics," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 107(4), pages 967-1004, April.
    13. Vasi A. E. Shaikh & Ishrat V. Shaikh, 2020. "COVID-19 Pandemic Kindled Innovations Leading to Primary Care Management in India: A Review," International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation, International Journal of Research and Scientific Innovation (IJRSI), vol. 7(8), pages 05-12, August.
    14. Giuseppe Attanasi & Ylenia Curci & Patrick Llerena & Adriana Carolina Pinate & Maria del Pino Ramos-Sosa & Giulia Urso, 2019. "Looking at Creativity from East to West: Risk Taking and Intrinsic Motivation in Socially and Culturally Diverse Countries," GREDEG Working Papers 2019-21, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    15. Kushlin, Valery Ivanovich (Кушлин, Валерий Иванович) & Ustenko, V.S. (Устенко, В.С.), 2016. "Analysis of International Experience of Intensification of Scientific and Innovative Activity in the Modern Unstable Conditions [Анализ Международного Опыта Активизации Научно-Инновационной Деятельности В Современных Нестабильных Условиях]," Working Papers 2832, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration.
    16. Weede Erich, 2015. "Von Hayek lernen: Wissen und Freiheit, Recht und Gesetzgebung / Learning from Hayek: Knowledge and Liberty, Law and Legislation," ORDO. Jahrbuch für die Ordnung von Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft, De Gruyter, vol. 66(1), pages 81-96, January.
    17. Deirdre Nansen McCloskey, 2019. "Lachmann practiced humanomics, beyond the dogma of behaviorism," The Review of Austrian Economics, Springer;Society for the Development of Austrian Economics, vol. 32(1), pages 47-61, March.
    18. Boerner, Lars & Rubin, Jared & Severgnini, Battista, 2021. "A time to print, a time to reform," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    19. Torben Klarl, 2025. "Creative class dynamics, technological evolution and growth," Bremen Papers on Economics & Innovation 2504, University of Bremen, Faculty of Business Studies and Economics.
    20. Francesco Saraceno, 2018. "The End of the Consensus? The Economic Crisis and the Crisis of Macroeconomics," Revue de l'OFCE, Presses de Sciences-Po, vol. 0(3), pages 319-334.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • O40 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - General
    • O43 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity - - - Institutions and Growth
    • O11 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development
    • N10 - Economic History - - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics; Industrial Structure; Growth; Fluctuations - - - General, International, or Comparative
    • P16 - Political Economy and Comparative Economic Systems - - Capitalist Economies - - - Capitalist Institutions; Welfare State
    • Z13 - Other Special Topics - - Cultural Economics - - - Economic Sociology; Economic Anthropology; Language; Social and Economic Stratification

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cuf:wpaper:805. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Qiang Gao (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/emcufcn.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.