IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Comment évaluer les effets du Plan Marshall2.Vert ?

Listed author(s):
  • Béatrice VAN HAEPEREN


    (IWEPS (Institut wallon de l’évaluation, de la prospective et de la statistique) and UCL)

  • Martine LEFEVRE


    (IWEPS (Institut wallon de l’évaluation, de la prospective et de la statistique))

  • Virginie LOUIS


    (IWEPS (Institut wallon de l’évaluation, de la prospective et de la statistique))

  • Mathieu MOSTY


    (IWEPS (Institut wallon de l’évaluation, de la prospective et de la statistique))

Registered author(s):

    Evaluer une politique, c’est la questionner d’une manière particulière, en vue de porter un jugement et d’éclairer les décideurs. Lorsque la politique à évaluer est le Plan Marshall2.Vert, qui couvre la plupart des compétences du Gouvernement wallon, l’évaluation est d’une grande complexité. L’objet de cet article est de décrire la démarche adoptée par l’IWEPS pour préparer l’évaluation du Plan Marshall2.Vert : analyse de la logique d’intervention, construction d’un référentiel d’évaluation, traduction des objectifs en indicateurs de résultat, constitution d’un programme d’évaluations partielles sont les principales étapes de cette démarche.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES) in its series Discussion Papers (IRES - Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales) with number 90.

    in new window

    Length: 18
    Date of creation: 27 Oct 2011
    Handle: RePEc:ctl:louvrg:90
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Place Montesquieu 3, 1348 Louvain-la-Neuve (Belgium)

    Fax: +32 10473945
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctl:louvrg:90. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Anne DAVISTER-LOGIST)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.