IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ctl/louvir/1995033.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Dominance and Equilibrium in Two-Person Alternating-Offer Bargaining with an Endogenous Deadline

Author

Listed:
  • Vannetelbosch, Vincent J.

    (UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES); UNIVERSITE CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN, Center for Operations Research and Econometrics (CORE))

Abstract

We study an alternating-offer bargaining game with a deadline from which the size of the cake decays. We consider both the cases of complete and one-sided incomplete information about players’ outside options. We characterize the set of strategy profiles that survive notions of iterated dominance and show how it restricts the behaviour of the players. We also study the relationship between this set of strategies and the set of subgame perfect equilibria (or perfect Bayesian equilibria). Then, we endogenize the choice of the deadline and we find that bargaining game is characterized by a deadline effect.

Suggested Citation

  • Vannetelbosch, Vincent J., 1995. "Dominance and Equilibrium in Two-Person Alternating-Offer Bargaining with an Endogenous Deadline," LIDAM Discussion Papers IRES 1995033, Université catholique de Louvain, Institut de Recherches Economiques et Sociales (IRES).
  • Handle: RePEc:ctl:louvir:1995033
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
    1. Check below whether another version of this item is available online.
    2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
    3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    bargaining; endogenous deadline; dominance;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • C78 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Bargaining Theory; Matching Theory

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ctl:louvir:1995033. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Virginie LEBLANC (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iruclbe.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.