Do Busy Boards Add Value to Standalone Firms relative to Business Groups?Evidence from India
We investigate whether busy boards add more value to standalone firms compared to business group affiliated firms in India – an economy plagued with significant institutional voids. Using board composition data of the top 500 Indian firms spanning the period 2003 to 2006, we find that firm performance improves when its board changes from being a board with nonbusy outside directors to a board with busy outside directors. Furthermore, directors’ qualifications and experience determine their directorships and degree of busyness. We also find that firms affiliated with business groups exhibit a negative relationship to the number of busy outside directors.
|Date of creation:||Feb 2011|
|Date of revision:|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: |
Fax: (765) 494-0869
Web page: http://www.cfs.purdue.edu/csr/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csr:wpaper:1009. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sugato Chakravarty)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.