IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/csa/wpaper/2023-11-02.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Jobseekers' beliefs about comparative advantage and (mis)directed search

Author

Listed:
  • Lukas Hensel
  • Kate Orkin
  • Andrea Kiss
  • Robert Garlick

Abstract

Worker sorting into tasks and occupations has long been recognized as an impor¬tant feature of labor markets. But this sorting may be inefficient if jobseekers have inaccurate beliefs about their skills and therefore apply to jobs that do not match their skills. To test this idea, we measure young South African jobseekers’ communication and numeracy skills and their beliefs about their skill levels. Many jobseekers be¬lieve they are better at the skill in which they score lower, relative to other jobseekers. These beliefs predict the skill requirements of jobs where they apply. In two field ex¬periments, giving jobseekers their skill assessment results shifts their beliefs toward their assessment results. It also redirects their search toward jobs that value the skill in which they score relatively higher – using measures from administrative, incentivized task, and survey data – but does not increase total search effort. It also raises earnings and job quality, consistent with inefficient sorting due to limited information.

Suggested Citation

  • Lukas Hensel & Kate Orkin & Andrea Kiss & Robert Garlick, 2025. "Jobseekers' beliefs about comparative advantage and (mis)directed search," CSAE Working Paper Series 2023-11-02, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
  • Handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:2023-11-02
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:d70f2baf-109c-4bd1-b531-8f0dd4585911
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:csa:wpaper:2023-11-02. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Julia Coffey (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/csaoxuk.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.