IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crs/wpaper/2026-05.html

Political feasibility of French income tax reforms

Author

Listed:
  • Pierre C. Boyer

    (CREST, Ecole polytechnique, Institut polytechnique de Paris)

  • Adel Takhedmit

    (CREST, Ecole polytechnique, Institut polytechnique de Paris)

  • Paul Vanborre

    (CREST, Ecole polytechnique, Institut polytechnique de Paris)

Abstract

We study recent income tax reforms in France from a political economy perspective. Building on Bierbrauer et al. (2021), who establish that the median voter is decisive for reforms where the change in the tax burden is monotonic in income, we make three contributions. First, using administrative tax data and a microsimulation model, we show that major French tax reforms since 2002 have been monotonic. Second, median voter support consistently aligned with majority support across all major reforms. Third, we compute upper and lower Pareto bounds for a range of taxable income elasticities. Violations of these bounds indicate situations where self-financing tax cuts are possible. This characterization identifies the space of politically feasible reforms. For elasticities below 0.25, the French tax system lies below the upper Pareto bound, while the lower bound remains far from the current schedule for conventional elasticity values.

Suggested Citation

  • Pierre C. Boyer & Adel Takhedmit & Paul Vanborre, 2026. "Political feasibility of French income tax reforms," Working Papers 2026-05, Center for Research in Economics and Statistics.
  • Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2026-05
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://crest.science/RePEc/wpstorage/2026-05.pdf
    File Function: CREST working paper version
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C72 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory - - - Noncooperative Games
    • D72 - Microeconomics - - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making - - - Political Processes: Rent-seeking, Lobbying, Elections, Legislatures, and Voting Behavior
    • D82 - Microeconomics - - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty - - - Asymmetric and Private Information; Mechanism Design
    • H21 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Efficiency; Optimal Taxation
    • H24 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Personal Income and Other Nonbusiness Taxes and Subsidies

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2026-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Secretariat General (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crestfr.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.