IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

On a Characterization of ordered Pivotal Sampling

Listed author(s):
  • Guillaume Chauvet


Registered author(s):

    When auxiliary information is available at the design stage, samples may be selected bymeans of balanced sampling. Deville and Tillé proposed in 2004 a general algorithm toperform balanced sampling, named the cube method. In this paper, we are interested in aparticular case of the cube method named pivotal sampling, and first described by Devilleand Tillé in 1998. We show that this sampling algorithm, when applied to units ranked ina fixed order, is equivalent to Deville’s systematic sampling, in the sense that both algorithmslead to the same sampling design. This characterization enables the computationof the second-order inclusion probabilities for pivotal sampling. We show that the pivotalsampling enables to take account of an appropriate ordering of the units to achieve avariance reduction, while limiting the loss of efficiency if the ordering is not appropriate.

    If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.

    File URL:
    File Function: Crest working paper version
    Download Restriction: no

    Paper provided by Center for Research in Economics and Statistics in its series Working Papers with number 2010-50.

    in new window

    Length: 27
    Date of creation: 2010
    Handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2010-50
    Contact details of provider: Postal:
    Bâtiment ENSAE, 5 rue Henry LE Chatelier, 91120 Palaiseau

    Phone: 01 41 17 60 81
    Web page:

    More information through EDIRC

    No references listed on IDEAS
    You can help add them by filling out this form.

    This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

    When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crs:wpaper:2010-50. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Sri Srikandan)

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

    If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.