Responding to the Downturn: How Does Information Change Behavior?
Many workers nearing retirement experienced a dramatic decrease in their retirement assets due to the stock market downturn. In order to maintain their expected standard of living in retirement, workers will need to work longer, save more, or do both. To measure the response of older workers to this downturn, the Center for Retirement Research at Boston College (CRR) fielded the CRR 2009 Retirement Survey on a nationally representative sample of 45-59-year-old labor force participants with relatively high pre-downturn assets.1 This brief is the third of four based on the CRR 2009 Retirement Survey. The first brief described the Survey and highlighted its unique financial, employment, and behavioral factors.2 The second brief explored the relationship between these factors and worker responses to the downturn.3 This brief examines how providing simple information about the trade-offs involved in responding to the downturn impacts the responses. This brief is organized as follows. The first section provides a brief overview of the initial responses – work more, save more, both, or neither. The second section describes how these responses changed once the trade-off between working longer, saving more, and consuming less in retirement was made explicit. The third section then explains the relationship between the initial responses and the more informed responses. The fourth section identifies the characteristics associated with respondents who changed their response. The final section concludes that providing simple information on trade-offs appears to have a surprisingly large impact on changing responses.
|Date of creation:||Dec 2010|
|Date of revision:||Dec 2010|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: Hovey House, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467|
Phone: (617) 552-1762
Fax: (617) 552-0191
Web page: http://crr.bc.edu/
More information through EDIRC
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:issbrf:ib2010-20. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Amy Grzybowski)or (Christopher F Baum)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.