IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crr/crrwps/wp2024-12.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Has Remote Work Improved Employment Outcomes for Older People with Disabilities?

Author

Listed:
  • Siyan Liu
  • Laura D. Quinby

Abstract

One aspect of the pandemic that has persisted is the increased relevance of remote work. This shift could help older people with disabilities, who might otherwise find it hard to get or keep jobs. Indeed, this group has a higher employment rate post-pandemic than pre-pandemic. Remote work, though, might not be the only factor contributing to this trend. More people report having a work-limiting impairment, which could lead to a higher employment rate among this group if the new health conditions are relatively mild. And the labor market has been extremely tight in recent years, which also helps boost employment. This study uses the 2012-2022 Health and Retirement Study to examine how remote work has contributed to the rising employment rate of older people with disabilities. Specifically, it estimates the gain in teleworkable employment from 2018 to 2022 controlling for potentially confounding factors, and attributes this gain to remote work. It then explores which types of older people with disabilities – based on their recent work history – have benefitted the most.

Suggested Citation

  • Siyan Liu & Laura D. Quinby, 2024. "Has Remote Work Improved Employment Outcomes for Older People with Disabilities?," Working Papers, Center for Retirement Research at Boston College wp2024-12, Center for Retirement Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2024-12
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://crr.bc.edu/has-remote-work-improved-employment-outcomes-for-older-people-with-disabilities/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crr:crrwps:wp2024-12. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Amy Grzybowski or Christopher F Baum (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crrbcus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.