IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/crp/wpaper/33.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

A Comparative Analysis of the Costs of Italian Individual Pension Plans

Author

Listed:
  • Elsa Fornero

    (Department of Economics, University of Turin and Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin)

  • Carolina Fugazza

    (Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin)

  • Giacomo Ponzetto

    (Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin)

Abstract

This paper analyzes the costs of third-pillar individual pension plans currently available in Italy, namely pension insurance policies and open pension funds, which are new products in the Italian savings market. For lack of data on annuities, the analysis is limited to the accumulation phase. To evaluate costs, we use different simulation scenarios, changing the length of the contribution period and the gross returns attainable on financial markets; we also consider participants with different life income and contribution profiles. Following international literature, we present cost measures which reflect the reduction in both the final accumulated pension wealth and the annual rate of return. The main result of our analysis is the existence of a substantial dichotomy in the market. On one side, open pension funds have moderate costs, close to those of voluntary pension plans in other countries and also to those of the Italian occupational pension funds (i.e. the second pillar). On the other, individual insurance policies are burdened by significantly higher charges. We consider different possible rationales for these costs, including the fact that the market is at a very early stage of development, without reaching a completely satisfactory explanation. Finally, we also study the possible regressive feature of the fee structure and the unfavourable treatment of early withdrawals of private pension assets; we conclude that both are indeed present in the majority of products, but that their impact is fairly limited.

Suggested Citation

  • Elsa Fornero & Carolina Fugazza & Giacomo Ponzetto, 2004. "A Comparative Analysis of the Costs of Italian Individual Pension Plans," CeRP Working Papers 33, Center for Research on Pensions and Welfare Policies, Turin (Italy).
  • Handle: RePEc:crp:wpaper:33
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cerp.carloalberto.org/wp-content/uploads/2008/12/wp_33.pdf?d2641f
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Pension funds;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crp:wpaper:33. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Silvia Maero (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/cetorit.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.