IDEAS home Printed from
MyIDEAS: Log in (now much improved!) to save this paper

Health Insurance and the Welfare Economics of Organ Transplants

Ce texte analyse les conséquences redistributives et allocatives du passage à un système de marché pour la gestion des organes prélevés sur des personnes décédées, par opposition au système actuel qui repose sur l'altruisme des donneurs et le rationnement médical des candidats à une greffe. Dans un système de marché, les individus bien portant pourraient vendre à terme le droit de prélèvement de leurs organes en cas de décès prématuré, mais le coût d'une greffe inclurait le prix au comptant des organes, ce coût pouvant être pris en compte dans les couvertures d'assurance maladie souscrites au préalable par les individus. Je montre qu'un tel changement de régime n'a pas pour effet de redistribuer le bien-être des pauvres vers les riches, mais qu'il a plutôt un effet redistributif au profit des donneurs altruistes du système actuel (qu'ils soient pauvres ou riches) et aux dépens des non-donneurs. Ce résultat repose sur la possibilité de souscrire des contrats d'assurance élaborés spécifiant de façon détaillée les contingences dans lesquelles une greffe sera indemnisée. Lorsque les contrats d'assurance sont incomplets, tous les individus, riches et pauvres, pourraient voir leur bien-être diminuer par suite du passage à un système de marché. This paper analyzes the redistributive and efficiency implications of switching from the current cadaveric organ procurement and allocation system, based on rationing and altruistic donorship, to a pure market based system. In the latter, individuals could sell forward the right to the removal of their organs at death, but potential recipients would need to pay the going market price of organs for a transplant, a cost that could be covered by their health insurance policy. I show that the effect of the change in regime is not to redistribute welfare from poor to rich individuals, but from current non-donnors to current donors. That is, current altruistic donnors, whether poor or rich, are strictly better off from the change and the only individuals who could be made worse off are the current non-donors. This result rests on the availability of sophisticated insurance contracts specifying in detail the contingencies under which an individual is to receive a transplant if he becomes ill. When insurance contracts are incomplete, both rich and poor alike can be made worse off by the change in regime.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques in its series Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM with number 9507.

in new window

Date of creation: Jul 1995
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cre:uqamwp:9507
Note: To receive copy, email author
Contact details of provider: Postal:
P.O. Box 8888, Downtown Station, Montreal (Canada) Quebec, H3C 3P8

Phone: (514) 987-4114
Fax: (514) 987-8494
Web page:

More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cre:uqamwp:9507. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stéphane Pallage)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.