IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/
MyIDEAS: Login to save this paper or follow this series

Laboratory Strife: Higgling as Experimental Science in Economics and Social Psychology

Ce texte a été préparé pour le colloque HIGGLING: Markets and their Transactors in the History of Economic Thought, à Duke University, mars 1993. Il s'agit de l'expérimentation en laboratoire des jeux denégotiation à deux personnes, dans la théorie économique et la théorie psycho-sociale, depuis la deuxième guerre mondiale. Pour ce qui a trait à ce premier, nous examinons les premières expériences de Siegel et Fouraker, puis celles basées sur le modèle axiomatique de Nash, et enfin les approches stratégiques qui font suite au travail de Rubinstein. En ce qui a trait à la psychologie, nous examinons plusieurs expériences qui se révèlent très hétérogènes etsans base théorique aussi rigoureuse que celle de l'économie. Néanmoins, les facteurs sociaux et culturels, qui sont mis en avant dans les expériences psychologiques, se manifestent de plus en plus dans celles de l'économie. Mais, la théorie d'utilité se révèle insuffisamment souple pour l'intégration théorique de ces facteurs. This paper was prepared for a conference on Higgling: Markets and their Transactors in the History of Economic Thought, held at Duke University, March 1993. The subject is laboratory experimentation on two-person bargaining in both the economics and social psychology literatures since World War II. In the former, we look at the early experiments of Siegel and Fouraker, and those based on the axiomatic models following Nash, and the strategic approaches following Rubinstein. In the latter, we survey a range of approaches, whose very heterogeneity reflects the absence of an even relatively narrow theoretical basis. What emerges is that while the economics experiments perpetually return to the importance of those social and cultural factors that social psychology literature emphasizes, the constraints of utility-based models sharply limit the extent to which these variables can be incorporated into the theory.

To our knowledge, this item is not available for download. To find whether it is available, there are three options:
1. Check below under "Related research" whether another version of this item is available online.
2. Check on the provider's web page whether it is in fact available.
3. Perform a search for a similarly titled item that would be available.

Paper provided by Université du Québec à Montréal, Département des sciences économiques in its series Cahiers de recherche du Département des sciences économiques, UQAM with number 9314.

as
in new window

Length:
Date of creation: Nov 1993
Date of revision:
Handle: RePEc:cre:uqamwp:9314
Note: To receive copy, email author
Contact details of provider: Postal: P.O. Box 8888, Downtown Station, Montreal (Canada) Quebec, H3C 3P8
Phone: (514) 987-4114
Fax: (514) 987-8494
Web page: http://www.uqam.ca/economie/
Email:


More information through EDIRC

No references listed on IDEAS
You can help add them by filling out this form.

This item is not listed on Wikipedia, on a reading list or among the top items on IDEAS.

When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cre:uqamwp:9314. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Stéphane Pallage)

If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.

If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.

If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

This information is provided to you by IDEAS at the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis using RePEc data.