Author
Listed:
- Vincent Bertrand
(Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CRESE UR3190, F-25000 Besançon, France)
- Louis Malissard
(Université Marie et Louis Pasteur, CRESE UR3190, F-25000 Besançon, France)
Abstract
This article offers a literature review on the system of certificates for attributing sources of decarbonized electricity generation, with a particular focus on how temporal matching rules between certificate consumption and production affect their consequential performance in reducing emissions. First, we explain how the electricity attribution certificates (EAC) system operates, describing its annual functioning and carbon accounting implications. Second, we identify how consumption’s motivations for attribution under the annual system led to new decarbonization ambitions justified by a switch to hourly matching practices. Also driven by the 24/7 Carbon-Free Electricity (CFE) procurement initiative, which combines temporal, regional, and additionality matching criteria, a growing body of literature has established a consequential modeling framework for the power system of each potential matching system. Drawing from this targeted corpus, we compare the effects of annual, hourly, and 24/7 CFE initiatives in terms of emissions reductions, transformation of the electricity mix, and induced costs. On the one hand, we note that the literature converges on the limited ability of annual matching to generate structural system impacts and additional emissions reductions. On the other hand, literature models significant environmental benefits from the 24/7 CFE procurement initiative, which more strongly directs investment toward decarbonized technologies available during residual hours of variable renewable generation, thereby reducing reliance on fossil fuels. However, we find that none of the studies isolate the effect of a standalone hourly-matching reform. Moreover, we highlight the limitations of the modeled results, including modeling assumptions, additional induced costs, and alignment with the attribution market architecture. This work illustrates a trade-off between a low-cost annual mechanism and a costly new market for 24/7 CFE procurement, contributing to the ongoing discussion on potential reform of the GHG Protocol.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:crb:wpaper:2026-05. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Laurent Kondratuk (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/crufcfr.html .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.