IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/749.html

Regional Versus Multilateral Liberalization of Trade in Services

Author

Listed:
  • Hoekman, Bernard

Abstract

At the same time as regional agreements to liberalize trade in services were being pursued by OECD countries, services were also introduced onto the agenda of a multilateral trade negotiation - the Uruguay Round. This paper focuses on the relationship between regional agreements and the draft General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS), negotiated under the auspices of the Uruguay Round. Following a conceptual discussion of the political economy of regional as opposed to multilateral negotiations, I analyse existing data on trade and investment flows with a view to gaining some insight into the likely interest group preferences influencing the choice between alternative institutional arrangements to liberalize trade in services. Both the data and a comparison of the content of the major existing agreements suggest that service industries are more likely to see regional and multilateral liberalization as complements than substitutes.

Suggested Citation

  • Hoekman, Bernard, 1993. "Regional Versus Multilateral Liberalization of Trade in Services," CEPR Discussion Papers 749, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
  • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:749
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=749
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:749. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: CEPR (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://cepr.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.