IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/cpr/ceprdp/446.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Product Line Competition and Shopping Costs: Why Firms May Choose to Compete Head-to-Head

Author

Listed:
  • Klemperer, Paul

Abstract

Consider firms each selling a range of products, when each consumer prefers to concentrate his purchases with a single supplier because of the `shopping costs' of using additional suppliers. If the firms offer different product ranges, some consumers will nevertheless use multiple suppliers to increase product variety and, since these consumers' purchases will be sensitive to the difference in firms' prices, the market may be quite competitive. If however, firms offer identical product ranges, no consumer will want to purchase from more than one firm (given the shopping costs) and the market may therefore be less competitive and equilibrium prices higher. This contrasts with the standard economic intuition that firms selling single products minimize competition by differentiating their products.

Suggested Citation

  • Klemperer, Paul, 1990. "Product Line Competition and Shopping Costs: Why Firms May Choose to Compete Head-to-Head," CEPR Discussion Papers 446, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    • Handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:446
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.cepr.org/active/publications/discussion_papers/dp.php?dpno=446
    Download Restriction: CEPR Discussion Papers are free to download for our researchers, subscribers and members. If you fall into one of these categories but have trouble downloading our papers, please contact us at subscribers@cepr.org
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. A. Jorge Padilla, 1991. "Consumer switching costs: a survey," Investigaciones Economicas, Fundación SEPI, vol. 15(3), pages 485-504, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cpr:ceprdp:446. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: the person in charge (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cepr.org .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.